<!-- MHonArc v2.4.4 -->
<!--X-Subject: Re: [MUD-Dev] Object and class heirarchies -- are they really necessary? -->
<!--X-From-R13: Buvyyvc Zrauneqg <cuvyraNshaxl.zbaxrl.bet> -->
<!--X-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 22:36:46 -0800 -->
<!--X-Message-Id: 20000322010133.A5367#funky,monkey.org -->
<!--X-Content-Type: text/plain -->
<!--X-Reference: E12XVws-0001DB-00#under,eng.cp.net -->
<!--X-Reference: 14551.65272.614292.445363#alyx,skotos.net -->
<!--X-Reference: zell#alyx,com -->
<!--X-Reference: E12XYWb-0000hk-00#under,eng.cp.net -->
<!--X-Head-End-->
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<html>
<head>
<title>MUD-Dev message, Re: [MUD-Dev] Object and class heirarchies -- are they really </title>
<!-- meta name="robots" content="noindex,nofollow" -->
<link rev="made" href="mailto:philen#funky,monkey.org">
</head>
<body background="/backgrounds/paperback.gif" bgcolor="#ffffff"
text="#000000" link="#0000FF" alink="#FF0000" vlink="#006000">
<font size="+4" color="#804040">
<strong><em>MUD-Dev<br>mailing list archive</em></strong>
</font>
<br>
[ <a href="../">Other Periods</a>
| <a href="../../">Other mailing lists</a>
| <a href="/search.php3">Search</a>
]
<br clear=all><hr>
<!--X-Body-Begin-->
<!--X-User-Header-->
<!--X-User-Header-End-->
<!--X-TopPNI-->
Date:
[ <a href="msg00687.html">Previous</a>
| <a href="msg00690.html">Next</a>
]
Thread:
[ <a href="msg00680.html">Previous</a>
| <a href="msg00695.html">Next</a>
]
Index:
[ <A HREF="author.html#00688">Author</A>
| <A HREF="#00688">Date</A>
| <A HREF="thread.html#00688">Thread</A>
]
<!--X-TopPNI-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-->
<!--X-Subject-Header-Begin-->
<H1>Re: [MUD-Dev] Object and class heirarchies -- are they really necessary?</H1>
<HR>
<!--X-Subject-Header-End-->
<!--X-Head-of-Message-->
<UL>
<LI><em>To</em>: <A HREF="mailto:mud-dev#kanga,nu">mud-dev#kanga,nu</A></LI>
<LI><em>Subject</em>: Re: [MUD-Dev] Object and class heirarchies -- are they really necessary?</LI>
<LI><em>From</em>: Phillip Lenhardt <<A HREF="mailto:philen#funky,monkey.org">philen#funky,monkey.org</A>></LI>
<LI><em>Date</em>: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 01:01:33 -0500</LI>
<LI><em>Reply-To</em>: <A HREF="mailto:mud-dev#kanga,nu">mud-dev#kanga,nu</A></LI>
<LI><em>Sender</em>: <A HREF="mailto:mud-dev-admin#kanga,nu">mud-dev-admin#kanga,nu</A></LI>
</UL>
<!--X-Head-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-Head-Body-Sep-Begin-->
<HR>
<!--X-Head-Body-Sep-End-->
<!--X-Body-of-Message-->
<PRE>
On Tue, Mar 21, 2000 at 03:57:25PM -0800, J C Lawrence wrote:
> True. That was one of the sources of the design requirement for
> Murkle that features must be programmable without requiring source
> access to any other objects.
No matter how many times I read this design requirement--and it has been
many: I have read and reread nearly every thread in the archive in which
it appears--I always come to the conclusion that it is either tautological
or trivially false. Since both those conclusions seem unlikely candidates
for what you mean, I was wondering if you could clarify.
I read your design requirement either as:
"Any object must be able to affect any other object without
changing that other object."
which is obviously my trivially false reading :) Or I read it as:
"Any object must be able to affect itself without changing
any other object."
which is my tautological reading.
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev#kanga,nu
<A HREF="http://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev">http://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev</A>
</PRE>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<HR>
<ul compact><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><A NAME="00695" HREF="msg00695.html">Re: [MUD-Dev] Object and class heirarchies -- are they really necessary?</A></strong>
<ul compact><li><em>From:</em> J C Lawrence <claw#cp,net></li></ul>
</UL></LI></UL>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<UL><LI><STRONG>References</STRONG>:
<UL>
<LI><STRONG><A NAME="00675" HREF="msg00675.html">[MUD-Dev] Object and class heirarchies -- are they really necessary?</A></STRONG>
<UL><LI><EM>From:</EM> J C Lawrence <claw#cp,net></LI></UL></LI>
<LI><STRONG><A NAME="00679" HREF="msg00679.html">Re: [MUD-Dev] Object and class heirarchies -- are they really necessary?</A></STRONG>
<UL><LI><EM>From:</EM> Par Winzell <zell#alyx,com></LI></UL></LI>
<LI><STRONG><A NAME="00680" HREF="msg00680.html">Re: [MUD-Dev] Object and class heirarchies -- are they really necessary?</A></STRONG>
<UL><LI><EM>From:</EM> J C Lawrence <claw#cp,net></LI></UL></LI>
</UL></LI></UL>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<UL>
<LI>Prev by Date:
<STRONG><A HREF="msg00687.html">Re: [MUD-Dev] Object and class heirarchies -- are they really necessary?</A></STRONG>
</LI>
<LI>Next by Date:
<STRONG><A HREF="msg00690.html">[MUD-Dev] Gamasutra: Online Justice Systems</A></STRONG>
</LI>
<LI>Prev by thread:
<STRONG><A HREF="msg00680.html">Re: [MUD-Dev] Object and class heirarchies -- are they really necessary?</A></STRONG>
</LI>
<LI>Next by thread:
<STRONG><A HREF="msg00695.html">Re: [MUD-Dev] Object and class heirarchies -- are they really necessary?</A></STRONG>
</LI>
<LI>Index(es):
<UL>
<LI><A HREF="index.html#00688"><STRONG>Date</STRONG></A></LI>
<LI><A HREF="thread.html#00688"><STRONG>Thread</STRONG></A></LI>
</UL>
</LI>
</UL>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
<ul><li>Thread context:
<BLOCKQUOTE><UL>
<LI><strong><A NAME="00675" HREF="msg00675.html">[MUD-Dev] Object and class heirarchies -- are they really necessary?</A></strong>,
J C Lawrence <a href="mailto:claw#cp,net">claw#cp,net</a>, Tue 21 Mar 2000, 21:12 GMT
<UL>
<LI><strong><A NAME="00678" HREF="msg00678.html">Re: [MUD-Dev] Object and class heirarchies -- are they really necessary?</A></strong>,
scott guzman <a href="mailto:shade2x#home,com">shade2x#home,com</a>, Tue 21 Mar 2000, 21:55 GMT
</LI>
<LI><strong><A NAME="00679" HREF="msg00679.html">Re: [MUD-Dev] Object and class heirarchies -- are they really necessary?</A></strong>,
Par Winzell <a href="mailto:zell#alyx,com">zell#alyx,com</a>, Tue 21 Mar 2000, 23:11 GMT
<UL>
<LI><strong><A NAME="00680" HREF="msg00680.html">Re: [MUD-Dev] Object and class heirarchies -- are they really necessary?</A></strong>,
J C Lawrence <a href="mailto:claw#cp,net">claw#cp,net</a>, Tue 21 Mar 2000, 23:57 GMT
<UL>
<LI><strong><A NAME="00688" HREF="msg00688.html">Re: [MUD-Dev] Object and class heirarchies -- are they really necessary?</A></strong>,
Phillip Lenhardt <a href="mailto:philen#funky,monkey.org">philen#funky,monkey.org</a>, Wed 22 Mar 2000, 06:36 GMT
<UL>
<LI><strong><A NAME="00695" HREF="msg00695.html">Re: [MUD-Dev] Object and class heirarchies -- are they really necessary?</A></strong>,
J C Lawrence <a href="mailto:claw#cp,net">claw#cp,net</a>, Wed 22 Mar 2000, 23:14 GMT
<UL>
<LI><strong><A NAME="00706" HREF="msg00706.html">Re: [MUD-Dev] Object and class heirarchies -- are they really necessary?</A></strong>,
Phillip Lenhardt <a href="mailto:philen#funky,monkey.org">philen#funky,monkey.org</a>, Thu 23 Mar 2000, 06:14 GMT
</LI>
</UL>
</LI>
</UL>
</LI>
</UL>
</LI>
<LI><strong><A NAME="00681" HREF="msg00681.html">Re: [MUD-Dev] Object and class heirarchies -- are they really necessary?</A></strong>,
Kevin Littlejohn <a href="mailto:darius#connect,com.au">darius#connect,com.au</a>, Wed 22 Mar 2000, 00:25 GMT
</LI>
</UL>
</LI>
<LI><strong><A NAME="00683" HREF="msg00683.html">Re: [MUD-Dev] Object and class heirarchies -- are they really necessary?</A></strong>,
Chris Jones <a href="mailto:cjones#v-wave,com">cjones#v-wave,com</a>, Wed 22 Mar 2000, 00:49 GMT
</LI>
</UL>
</LI>
</UL></BLOCKQUOTE>
</ul>
<hr>
<center>
[ <a href="../">Other Periods</a>
| <a href="../../">Other mailing lists</a>
| <a href="/search.php3">Search</a>
]
</center>
<hr>
</body>
</html>