<!-- MHonArc v2.4.4 -->
<!--X-Subject: [MUD-Dev] processors -->
<!--X-From-R13: <qvnoybNorfg.pbz> -->
<!--X-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 08:58:51 -0800 -->
<!--X-Message-Id: Pine.BSF.4.05.9901281649410.906-100000#shell9,ba.best.com -->
<!--X-Content-Type: text/plain -->
<!--X-Head-End-->
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<html>
<head>
<title>MUD-Dev message, [MUD-Dev] processors</title>
<!-- meta name="robots" content="noindex,nofollow" -->
<link rev="made" href="mailto:diablo#best,com">
</head>
<body background="/backgrounds/paperback.gif" bgcolor="#ffffff"
text="#000000" link="#0000FF" alink="#FF0000" vlink="#006000">
<font size="+4" color="#804040">
<strong><em>MUD-Dev<br>mailing list archive</em></strong>
</font>
<br>
[ <a href="../">Other Periods</a>
| <a href="../../">Other mailing lists</a>
| <a href="/search.php3">Search</a>
]
<br clear=all><hr>
<!--X-Body-Begin-->
<!--X-User-Header-->
<!--X-User-Header-End-->
<!--X-TopPNI-->
Date:
[ <a href="msg00316.html">Previous</a>
| <a href="msg00318.html">Next</a>
]
Thread:
[ <a href="msg00324.html">Previous</a>
| <a href="msg00319.html">Next</a>
]
Index:
[ <A HREF="author.html#00317">Author</A>
| <A HREF="#00317">Date</A>
| <A HREF="thread.html#00317">Thread</A>
]
<!--X-TopPNI-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-->
<!--X-Subject-Header-Begin-->
<H1>[MUD-Dev] processors</H1>
<HR>
<!--X-Subject-Header-End-->
<!--X-Head-of-Message-->
<UL>
<LI><em>To</em>: <A HREF="mailto:mud-dev#kanga,nu">mud-dev#kanga,nu</A></LI>
<LI><em>Subject</em>: [MUD-Dev] processors</LI>
<LI><em>From</em>: <<A HREF="mailto:diablo#best,com">diablo#best,com</A>></LI>
<LI><em>Date</em>: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 16:54:03 -0800 (PST)</LI>
<LI><em>Reply-To</em>: <A HREF="mailto:mud-dev#kanga,nu">mud-dev#kanga,nu</A></LI>
</UL>
<!--X-Head-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-Head-Body-Sep-Begin-->
<HR>
<!--X-Head-Body-Sep-End-->
<!--X-Body-of-Message-->
<PRE>
I hope this isn't the wrong forum to ask this question. If it is, I
apologize.
Achaea has recently run into processor-overload. We run a PII300 and now
we are going to have to upgrade at least to a PII450. The other option we
are considering is a Xeon-based machine. I am not a techie, but from what
I understand, the Xeon chip is likely to be faster for a mud, as it
doesn't fool around with all the MMX and other graphical bs on the Pentium
line. However, I cannot find any benchmarks comparing the two in terms of
pure processing powr. The Pentiums are always rated using graphical
applications and the Xeons are not.
So, I'm wondering if any of you know how much faster a Xeon is in terms of
pure processing power than a PII450. I know it has a much larger cache,
etc, but other than that, i'm clueless. The Xeon is a lot more expensive,
and if it doesn't give a significant advantage, it's not worth it.
Thanks for any help you can provide.
--matt
</PRE>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<HR>
<ul compact><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><A NAME="00329" HREF="msg00329.html">[MUD-Dev] Re: processors</A></strong>
<ul compact><li><em>From:</em> J C Lawrence <claw#kanga,nu></li></ul>
<li><strong><A NAME="00319" HREF="msg00319.html">[MUD-Dev] Re: processors</A></strong>
<ul compact><li><em>From:</em> Laurel Fan <lf25+@andrew.cmu.edu></li></ul>
</UL></LI></UL>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<UL>
<LI>Prev by Date:
<STRONG><A HREF="msg00316.html">[MUD-Dev] Re: Mud reviewing</A></STRONG>
</LI>
<LI>Next by Date:
<STRONG><A HREF="msg00318.html">[MUD-Dev] quests involving players</A></STRONG>
</LI>
<LI>Prev by thread:
<STRONG><A HREF="msg00324.html">[MUD-Dev] Re: quests involving players</A></STRONG>
</LI>
<LI>Next by thread:
<STRONG><A HREF="msg00319.html">[MUD-Dev] Re: processors</A></STRONG>
</LI>
<LI>Index(es):
<UL>
<LI><A HREF="index.html#00317"><STRONG>Date</STRONG></A></LI>
<LI><A HREF="thread.html#00317"><STRONG>Thread</STRONG></A></LI>
</UL>
</LI>
</UL>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
<ul><li>Thread context:
<BLOCKQUOTE><UL>
<LI><strong><A NAME="00318" HREF="msg00318.html">[MUD-Dev] quests involving players</A></strong>,
diablo <a href="mailto:diablo#best,com">diablo#best,com</a>, Thu 28 Jan 1999, 18:07 GMT
<UL>
<LI><strong><A NAME="00346" HREF="msg00346.html">[MUD-Dev] Re: quests involving players</A></strong>,
Darren Henderson <a href="mailto:darren#jasper,somtel.com">darren#jasper,somtel.com</a>, Sat 30 Jan 1999, 08:16 GMT
<UL>
<LI><strong><A NAME="00321" HREF="msg00321.html">[MUD-Dev] Re: quests involving players</A></strong>,
Caliban Tiresias Darklock <a href="mailto:caliban#darklock,com">caliban#darklock,com</a>, Sat 30 Jan 1999, 08:32 GMT
</LI>
</UL>
</LI>
<LI><strong><A NAME="00324" HREF="msg00324.html">[MUD-Dev] Re: quests involving players</A></strong>,
Richard Woolcock <a href="mailto:KaVir#dial,pipex.com">KaVir#dial,pipex.com</a>, Sat 30 Jan 1999, 12:45 GMT
</LI>
</UL>
</LI>
<LI><strong><A NAME="00317" HREF="msg00317.html">[MUD-Dev] processors</A></strong>,
diablo <a href="mailto:diablo#best,com">diablo#best,com</a>, Thu 28 Jan 1999, 16:58 GMT
<UL>
<LI><strong><A NAME="00319" HREF="msg00319.html">[MUD-Dev] Re: processors</A></strong>,
Laurel Fan <a href="mailto:lf25+@andrew.cmu.edu">lf25+@andrew.cmu.edu</a>, Thu 28 Jan 1999, 20:35 GMT
<UL>
<LI><strong><A NAME="00323" HREF="msg00323.html">[MUD-Dev] Re: processors</A></strong>,
Mik Clarke <a href="mailto:mikclrk#ibm,net">mikclrk#ibm,net</a>, Sat 30 Jan 1999, 12:26 GMT
</LI>
</UL>
</LI>
<LI><strong><A NAME="00329" HREF="msg00329.html">[MUD-Dev] Re: processors</A></strong>,
J C Lawrence <a href="mailto:claw#kanga,nu">claw#kanga,nu</a>, Sun 31 Jan 1999, 02:18 GMT
<UL>
<LI><strong><A NAME="00331" HREF="msg00331.html">[MUD-Dev] Re: processors</A></strong>,
diablo <a href="mailto:diablo#best,com">diablo#best,com</a>, Sun 31 Jan 1999, 03:00 GMT
</LI>
</UL>
</LI>
</UL>
</LI>
</UL></BLOCKQUOTE>
</ul>
<hr>
<center>
[ <a href="../">Other Periods</a>
| <a href="../../">Other mailing lists</a>
| <a href="/search.php3">Search</a>
]
</center>
<hr>
</body>
</html>