MUD-Dev
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[MUD-Dev] Re: Question on c++ switch optimization, and parsers in general.
On Tue, 9 Feb 1999, I wrote:
> extern command_data *__start_cvs, *__stop_cvs;
>
> command_data **p;
> for (p = &__start_cvs; p < &__stop_cvs; p++) {
> /* do something with (**p) */
> }
Err, those should be __start_commands and __stop_commands of course
(that'll teach me to try to write code immediately after waking up)
-O
- Thread context:
- [MUD-Dev] Re: Question on c++ switch optimization, and parsers in general., (continued)
- [MUD-Dev] Re: Question on c++ switch optimization, and parsers in general.,
Adam Wiggins adam#angel,com, Mon 08 Feb 1999, 19:47 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: Question on c++ switch optimization, and parsers in general.,
Mark Gritter mark#erdos,Stanford.EDU, Mon 08 Feb 1999, 21:18 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: Question on c++ switch optimization, and parsers in general.,
Oliver Jowett icecube#ihug,co.nz, Mon 08 Feb 1999, 21:23 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: Question on c++ switch optimization, and parsers in general.,
Ola Fosheim Grøstad olag#ifi,uio.no, Tue 09 Feb 1999, 00:16 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: Question on c++ switch optimization, and parsers in general.,
Richard Woolcock KaVir#dial,pipex.com, Tue 09 Feb 1999, 01:12 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] client images,
Chris Gray cg#ami-cg,GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA, Sun 07 Feb 1999, 21:09 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]