MUD-Dev
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[MUD-Dev] Re: processors
On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, John Bertoglio wrote:
> The Xeon has the full MMX extension set. While this serves little positive
> purpose on a conventional server, it doesn't hurt either.
>
I heard or read somewhere that there have been OS/Apps that can be or are
optimized to use the MMX registers to help improve multitasking and such.
Anyone heard about this? I think maybe the rc5 client thing does it...not
sure.
Wes!
wconnell#eden,com
Message will arrive in the mail. Destroy, before the FBI sees it.
- Thread context:
- [MUD-Dev] Re: Question on c++ switch optimization, and parsers in general., (continued)
- [MUD-Dev] client images,
Chris Gray cg#ami-cg,GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA, Sun 07 Feb 1999, 21:09 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: processors,
John Bertoglio alexb#internetcds,com, Fri 29 Jan 1999, 07:11 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [MUD-Dev] Re: processors,
Quzah [softhome] quzah#softhome,net, Sun 31 Jan 1999, 07:33 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: processors,
Chris Gray cg#ami-cg,GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA, Mon 01 Feb 1999, 05:21 GMT
- [MUD-Dev] Re: processors,
gunderwood gunderwood#donet,com, Mon 01 Feb 1999, 21:05 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]