The second part of this statement is blatantly false and obvious based on biased assumptions and a lack of experience.
Haha, you can't troll a troll darling. I'd respond to your "power words" and other, for lack of a better word, uninsightful comments, but a man with my experience fortunately knows better.
Tyche said:
If you had to update 50 lines of code in 10 modules to make a feature change, then your application is almost by definition poorly partitioned and strongly coupled….not weakly coupled. I mean the point of partitioning into modules is to centralize (and encapsulate) the code for subsystems/features in a module.
I was more thinking along the line of someone reporting a bug that had slipped itself into several modules. If all modules are weakly coupled I assume they all need their own set of utility functions, which in turn are likely to have many similarities, assuming few programmers can resist the temptation of copy/paste.
Haha, you can't troll a troll darling. I'd respond to your "power words" and other, for lack of a better word, uninsightful comments, but a man with my experience fortunately knows better.
I was more thinking along the line of someone reporting a bug that had slipped itself into several modules. If all modules are weakly coupled I assume they all need their own set of utility functions, which in turn are likely to have many similarities, assuming few programmers can resist the temptation of copy/paste.