That part is key. We know better than to have one large code repository due to Calvin, I wouldn't suggest having one source of anything else in the future either.
eta: hell of a job putting that together Scandum, nice work.
Thanks.
Samson said:
Any chance of squeezing SmaugFUSS in?
Done.
Fizban said:
He's the Diku License Violator that banned me from TMS for calling him a DIKU License Violator.
For what it's worth: http://www.aardwolf.com/v3/v3diku.html - Sounds like a genuine effort of a rewrite. I got banned from MudBytes once for being political incorrect, shit happens.
Tyche said:
No there's at least a dozen, but only one is pink. :-)
Quite a few are TinyMUD only or have a different scope. I think mudwiki.org has a lot going for it with the current setup, domain name, and the lack of annoying banners. Once some artwork is put in it should look pretty slick as well.
Included a banner into the main page and prettied it up, looks pretty cool now. Waiting for Lasher to update the logo and it should be good to go. I added a basic MudBytes article but I lack information about the owner/authors/launch date.
30 Mar, 2009, Hades_Kane wrote in the 26th comment:
Votes: 0
Scandum said:
Included a banner into the main page and prettied it up, looks pretty cool now. Waiting for Lasher to update the logo and it should be good to go. I added a basic MudBytes article but I lack information about the owner/authors/launch date.
As far as the owners/authors, I'm under the impression that Davion, Kiasyn, and Samson are the owners/authors, but someone I'm sure will correct me if I'm wrong soon :p
30 Mar, 2009, David Haley wrote in the 27th comment:
So let's say my players want to create pages (probably subpages from my MUD article) of say areas/skills/etc on my MUD. Is that something this Wiki is suitable for?
So let's say my players want to create pages (probably subpages from my MUD article) of say areas/skills/etc on my MUD. Is that something this Wiki is suitable for?
No, it's supposed to be a generic wiki with a preference of primary sources over secondary sources. On Wikipedia good secondary sources are a must, which aren't available for most mud related topics.
That part is key. We know better than to have one large code repository due to Calvin, I wouldn't suggest having one source of anything else in the future either.