When someone on a mud is violating rules, they usually get a number of warnings, and if they are not admins, their admins are also notified as possible. Whether warnings are issued is obviously dependent on the type of behavior. Sufficiently disruptive behavior (at our discretion) can subject a mud to immediate action without warning. But this is extremely rare. Warnings are provided when reasonable. If the behavior doesn't stop, then that mud may be excluded from the channel where it's causing problems. If the mud then causes problems on other channels, it may be banned from the server entirely. This is a drastic and very unusual situation.
I guess you got warnings, etc, as stated in the rules? I read that link but couldn't see where you did, or the ban point tbh.
When someone on a mud is violating rules, they usually get a number of warnings, and if they are not admins, their admins are also notified as possible. Whether warnings are issued is obviously dependent on the type of behavior. Sufficiently disruptive behavior (at our discretion) can subject a mud to immediate action without warning. But this is extremely rare. Warnings are provided when reasonable. If the behavior doesn't stop, then that mud may be excluded from the channel where it's causing problems. If the mud then causes problems on other channels, it may be banned from the server entirely. This is a drastic and very unusual situation.
I guess you got warnings, etc, as stated in the rules? I read that link but couldn't see where you did, or the ban point tbh.
Depends on how you look at "warning" I guess. Since this was basically an internet argument which ended with "I'm admin so I win", some of the statements could go either way.
As to the ban point, it was right around here:
After Lyanic's statement, I didn't receive anything else that night, and the stuff me and Sini said didn't make it out to IMC2.
What's rude about 3 stooges join the nazi party? :)
Well I'm not really hip to the current terminology used on MudBytes. I would guess that "stooges" would translate to "stupid cunts" and "nazis" would translate to "fascist cocksuckers" in current MudBytes lingo. I'm not really sure about it though. And whether it is acceptable or not depends solely on the target of the commentary. The more important concept is their overt assurance that they will continue to act in an objectively disordered manner.
What's rude about 3 stooges join the nazi party? :)
Well I'm not really hip to the current terminology used on MudBytes. I would guess that "stooges" would translate to "stupid cunts" and "nazis" would translate to "fascist cocksuckers" in current MudBytes lingo. I'm not really sure about it though. And whether it is acceptable or not depends solely on the target of the commentary. The more important concept is their overt assurance that they will continue to act in an objectively disordered manner.
So, saying something like this is a bannable offense on ichat but is fine on MB?
More fun to look at too. Also, Tyche: stop being sexist. :sad:
Psychologists and sociologists define my views as "benevolent sexism" and they link it to all sorts of insidious evils in the world. They've even discovered a strong correlation with it to conservative ideology and religious beliefs. Rather than being :sad:, it might be helpful to view it as a sort of mental handicap or form of mild retardation.
My best guess is that what Kiasyn meant is that i haven't tried to circumvent his ill-considered ban.
-Crat
http://lpmuds.net