28 Aug, 2007, Conner wrote in the 21st comment:
Votes: 0
Samson said:
It's libel. He libeled you. Slander is oral. Tossing around legal terms is slippery business.

Now, that said…..

Before this all turns south and becomes a flamewar over who stole what from whom, just don't go there. You've both said your piece. And I'm removing the needless personal attacks Tridor stuffed onto the end of the post.


:lol: Libel and Slander are such confusing concepts.. :wink:

Woohoo! Samson finally got to exercise his moderatorship powers here again. :wink: And it sounds like it was for the right reasons too. :smile:
28 Aug, 2007, KaVir wrote in the 22nd comment:
Votes: 0
tridore said:
The codebase in question isn't even original enough to be released from Russ Walsh's copyrights also, which makes it freeware. (not over 51% original from copyright)


Even if you changed 100%, it would still be a derivative work, protected by copyright and bound by the appropriate licence/s.
28 Aug, 2007, Omega wrote in the 23rd comment:
Votes: 0
I ::heart:: Kavir :)

thats the same tripe Medthievia said, over 51% converted, nolonger original, then went to saying 100% rewritten (which is bs as I have the source)

So, once again, kavir = right :) Thus Kavir = awesome :)

Sorry, limited time to type, thus the equal signs.

Anywho.

PEACE!
20.0/23