25 Mar, 2009, Cratylus wrote in the 1st comment:
Votes: 0
This is the discussion thread for MSSP_Fields
25 Mar, 2009, Hades_Kane wrote in the 2nd comment:
I don't understand why we have 4 topics on the most recent discussed threads that are all basically about the same thing…
25 Mar, 2009, Cratylus wrote in the 3rd comment:
Hades_Kane said:
I don't understand why we have 4 topics on the most recent discussed threads that are all basically about the same thing…
This thread was autocreated! I didn't make it on purpose. See http://www.mudbytes.net/index.php?a=topi...
25 Mar, 2009, Davion wrote in the 4th comment:
These topics are created to discuss the article itself, rather than the actual principals of MSSP.
26 Mar, 2009, David Haley wrote in the 5th comment:
In this article, does it make sense to start writing up the whole protocol, not just the fields definition?
26 Mar, 2009, Cratylus wrote in the 6th comment:
David Haley said:
In this article, does it make sense to start writing up the whole protocol, not just the fields definition?
I wasn't sure which way to go on that question…I figured starting with separate articles
would cause the least angst:
http://mudbytes.net/index.php?a=articles...
http://mudbytes.net/index.php?a=articles...
But I'm cool with joining them if that's desired.
-Crat
http://lpmuds.net
26 Mar, 2009, David Haley wrote in the 7th comment:
No, having them separate works for me, although we might have to address that if we run into, ah, "personal preference wars". :wink:
26 Mar, 2009, Scandum wrote in the 8th comment:
Would be a very bad idea, I'm sure we can work things out.
26 Mar, 2009, David Haley wrote in the 9th comment:
Yes Scandum, let's hope we can. :smile:
Random Picks
