ldmud-3.2.9/doc/
ldmud-3.2.9/doc/efun/
ldmud-3.2.9/mud/
ldmud-3.2.9/mud/heaven7/
ldmud-3.2.9/mud/heaven7/lib/
ldmud-3.2.9/mud/lp-245/
ldmud-3.2.9/mud/lp-245/banish/
ldmud-3.2.9/mud/lp-245/doc/
ldmud-3.2.9/mud/lp-245/doc/examples/
ldmud-3.2.9/mud/lp-245/doc/sefun/
ldmud-3.2.9/mud/lp-245/log/
ldmud-3.2.9/mud/lp-245/obj/Go/
ldmud-3.2.9/mud/lp-245/players/lars/
ldmud-3.2.9/mud/lp-245/room/death/
ldmud-3.2.9/mud/lp-245/room/maze1/
ldmud-3.2.9/mud/lp-245/room/sub/
ldmud-3.2.9/mud/lp-245/secure/
ldmud-3.2.9/mud/morgengrauen/
ldmud-3.2.9/mud/morgengrauen/lib/
ldmud-3.2.9/mud/sticklib/
ldmud-3.2.9/mud/sticklib/src/
ldmud-3.2.9/mudlib/uni-crasher/
ldmud-3.2.9/pkg/
ldmud-3.2.9/pkg/debugger/
ldmud-3.2.9/pkg/diff/
ldmud-3.2.9/pkg/misc/
ldmud-3.2.9/src/autoconf/
ldmud-3.2.9/src/bugs/
ldmud-3.2.9/src/bugs/MudCompress/
ldmud-3.2.9/src/bugs/b-020916-files/
ldmud-3.2.9/src/bugs/doomdark/
ldmud-3.2.9/src/bugs/ferrycode/ferry/
ldmud-3.2.9/src/bugs/ferrycode/obj/
ldmud-3.2.9/src/bugs/psql/
ldmud-3.2.9/src/done/
ldmud-3.2.9/src/done/order_alist/
ldmud-3.2.9/src/done/order_alist/obj/
ldmud-3.2.9/src/done/order_alist/room/
ldmud-3.2.9/src/gcc/
ldmud-3.2.9/src/gcc/2.7.0/
ldmud-3.2.9/src/gcc/2.7.1/
ldmud-3.2.9/src/hosts/
ldmud-3.2.9/src/hosts/GnuWin32/
ldmud-3.2.9/src/hosts/amiga/NetIncl/
ldmud-3.2.9/src/hosts/amiga/NetIncl/netinet/
ldmud-3.2.9/src/hosts/amiga/NetIncl/sys/
ldmud-3.2.9/src/hosts/i386/
ldmud-3.2.9/src/hosts/msdos/byacc/
ldmud-3.2.9/src/hosts/msdos/doc/
ldmud-3.2.9/src/hosts/os2/
ldmud-3.2.9/src/hosts/win32/
ldmud-3.2.9/src/util/
ldmud-3.2.9/src/util/erq/
ldmud-3.2.9/src/util/indent/hosts/next/
ldmud-3.2.9/src/util/xerq/
ldmud-3.2.9/src/util/xerq/lpc/
ldmud-3.2.9/src/util/xerq/lpc/www/
Short: Two-element datatype
From: Daniel von Dincklage <vondincklage@usa.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 1998 00:53:36 +0200
Type: Feature
State: Unclassified

>> - A datatype that stores two values and can be indexed like an array.
>>   In situations where you need lots of small arrays (with two elements)
>>   this would save a lot of memory.
>
> Would a class/struct datatype solve this for you? An array of two-value
> structs would probably be just the thing...
>
> (Yes, I like the name "struct", just because MudOS picked "class". ;-)

Well, not really. The whole idea behind that was perfomance and saved
memory. Currently, I use arrays with two (or three) members a LOT.
I'm not that happy with the fact that the arrays use about twice as
much memory as I'd need to store the two items for themselves. Just a
memory issue.


Maybe a more efficient storage method for arrays would help?
No, it wouldn't. Current overhead for arrays is 2 words (3 in DEBUG),
plus the malloc overhead which is unavoidable anyway. Minimum overhead
would be 1 word + malloc overhead.

Hmm, but maybe tuples which are copied by value? Would be a nice
complement to structs.