MudBytes
» MUDBytes Community » Discussion » General Chatter » The Latest Drama Thread
Topic Locked
Pages: << prev ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 ... next >>
The Latest Drama Thread
David Haley
Wizard






Group: Members
Posts: 5,730
Joined: Jun 30, 2007

Go to the bottom of the page Go to the top of the page
#226 Posted Jul 1, 2009, 5:26 pm

David Haley said:
I don't know about you, but my IQ is 156, and I type at 106 wpm with 99.2% accuracy.

For the record, just because that might have been too much of an in-joke, I was playing on Locke's web page and not making any claim about my own intelligence or typing skills.  :tongue: As a matter of fact, I have never taken an IQ test and have no idea whatsoever what my score would be.
.........................
-- d.c.h --
BabbleMUD Project (custom codebase)
Legends of the Darkstone (head coder)
http://david.the-haleys.org
.........................

Runter
Wizard






Group: Members
Posts: 1,074
Joined: Jun 1, 2006

Go to the bottom of the page Go to the top of the page
#227 Posted Jul 1, 2009, 5:27 pm


Scandum said:
Runter said:
Sounds like an argument against intelligence.

More a matter of economy. For example strength and speed are to a degree exclusive, Olympic athletes tend to train for either, but typically not for both, the limitation is largely evolutionary, that is, we could breed humans that are both fast and strong. The same goes for intelligence, we can breed humans that have both a high field dependence and a high IQ, but in practice you see that the two, to a degree, are exclusive.

High field dependence is associated with high creativity, and low field dependence is associated with high IQ. This is why the label 'creative genius' is used to separate your average high IQ genius with what is commonly understood when someone is labeled a 'genius'. I should mention that there is no clear scientific consensus when it comes to creativity and IQ.


In that case I guess we need to keep David from passing on those bad genes.  Only the Scandums of the world shall reproduce.
.........................
-Heath

For once you have tasted flight Ruby you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards,
for there you have been and there you will long to return. --
                                              Leonardo Da Vinci Yukihiro Matsumoto

Cratylus
Wizard






Group: Members
Posts: 1,224
Joined: May 22, 2006

Go to the bottom of the page Go to the top of the page
#228 Posted Jul 1, 2009, 6:46 pm

Runter said:
In that case I guess we need to keep David from passing on those bad genes.  Only the Scandums of the world shall reproduce.


I thought eugenics was about promoting good traits?

-Crat

Sandi
Wizard






Group: Members
Posts: 622
Joined: Jun 17, 2006

Go to the bottom of the page Go to the top of the page
#229 Posted Jul 1, 2009, 6:52 pm


aidil said:

I clearly meant prejudice.


Yes, you clearly meant prejudice. You very clearly meant prejudice.

"Any program where someone other then the person in question gets to decide on someone else's right to procreate will result in prejudice."

I think you're going out on a limb, here. Want a banana?  :smirk:
.........................
The Witch of Tir na nOg

www.tnnmud.com
tnnmud.com 6789

Ssolvarain
Sorcerer






Group: Members
Posts: 322
Joined: Nov 14, 2008

Go to the bottom of the page Go to the top of the page
#230 Posted Jul 1, 2009, 8:42 pm

The combined intelligence of several humans brought the computer before you into existence. Without that, we might as well be dogs.
.........................
Builder, End of Time eotmud.com:4000
The Rodney Dangerfield of Mudding.

Scandum
Wizard






Group: Members
Posts: 1,105
Joined: Aug 8, 2006

Go to the bottom of the page Go to the top of the page
#231 Posted Jul 1, 2009, 10:36 pm

Runter said:
In that case I guess we need to keep David from passing on those bad genes.  Only the Scandums of the world shall reproduce.

Oh wait, you're that guy who like a broken record keeps repeating the same misinterpretation over and over. I'd psychoanalyze you, but I'm stumped about the kind of upbringing that would encourage something as stupid as that.

Sandi said:

"Any program where someone other then the person in question gets to decide on someone else's right to procreate will result in prejudice."

I think you're going out on a limb, here. Want a banana?  :smirk:

I wonder if he has a problem with the justice system as well, you know, where someone other than the person in question gets to decide on someone else's right to freedom, certainly that must result in discrimination, prejudice, and.. favoritism. I mean, it's a slippery slope (pause for dramatic effect), before you know it everyone will be in jail.

David Haley
Wizard






Group: Members
Posts: 5,730
Joined: Jun 30, 2007

Go to the bottom of the page Go to the top of the page
#232 Posted Jul 1, 2009, 10:47 pm

I thought that your whole "argument" was that it's all about hereditary traits, not environment like "upbringing"... Hmm...
.........................
-- d.c.h --
BabbleMUD Project (custom codebase)
Legends of the Darkstone (head coder)
http://david.the-haleys.org
.........................

Runter
Wizard






Group: Members
Posts: 1,074
Joined: Jun 1, 2006

Go to the bottom of the page Go to the top of the page
#233 Posted Jul 1, 2009, 10:48 pm



Scandum said:
I'd psychoanalyze you, but I'm stumped about the kind of upbringing that would encourage something as stupid as that.


Scandum is the smartest guy in the room.  Just ask him, he'll tell you.

Scandum said:

I wonder if he has a problem with the justice system as well, you know, where someone other than the person in question gets to decide on someone else's right to freedom, certainly that must result in discrimination, prejudice, and.. favoritism. I mean, it's a slippery slope (pause for dramatic effect), before you know it everyone will be in jail.


You can tell that to everyone who actually has been discriminated against over the years.  You can compare all of those injustices to imprisoning criminals when you explain it to them.
.........................
-Heath

For once you have tasted flight Ruby you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards,
for there you have been and there you will long to return. --
                                              Leonardo Da Vinci Yukihiro Matsumoto

Scandum
Wizard






Group: Members
Posts: 1,105
Joined: Aug 8, 2006

Go to the bottom of the page Go to the top of the page
#234 Posted Jul 1, 2009, 11:30 pm

David Haley said:
I thought that your whole "argument" was that it's all about hereditary traits, not environment like "upbringing"... Hmm...

Compulsive behavior is generally an acquired trait, though obviously there's a genetic predisposition. I don't think Runter at this point in time can stop himself from repeatedly praising my supposed evolutionary fitness. It'd be endearing if it wasn't such a sad attempt at flame warring.

Runter
Wizard






Group: Members
Posts: 1,074
Joined: Jun 1, 2006

Go to the bottom of the page Go to the top of the page
#235 Posted Jul 1, 2009, 11:32 pm


Scandum said:
David Haley said:
I thought that your whole "argument" was that it's all about hereditary traits, not environment like "upbringing"... Hmm...

Compulsive behavior is generally an acquired trait, though obviously there's a genetic predisposition. I don't think Runter at this point in time can stop himself from repeatedly praising my supposed evolutionary fitness. It'd be endearing if it wasn't such a sad attempt at flame warring.


'Supposed' is a good start.  I'd use the word alleged, probably.
.........................
-Heath

For once you have tasted flight Ruby you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards,
for there you have been and there you will long to return. --
                                              Leonardo Da Vinci Yukihiro Matsumoto

Igabod
Wizard






Group: Members
Posts: 969
Joined: Jul 23, 2008

Go to the bottom of the page Go to the top of the page
#236 Posted Jul 2, 2009, 12:25 am

Well, it looks like this thread is finally turning into a semi-decent debate thread. Glad to see it. I still can't be bothered to read every single post since yesterday, but I'm pleasantly surprised with the direction this has taken. Keep it up guys and gals.
.........................
http://www.dark-warriors.net/banners/sm/5.gif Join the rest of the Dark Warriors in the struggle to be the greatest.

Bored?? Click THIS and you too can build your own mini city.

Every man has his follies, and often they are the most interesting thing he has got - Josh Billings

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. - Albert Einstein

I have a love interest in every one of my films... a gun. - Arnold Schwarzenegger

Recession is when a neighbor loses his job. Depression is when you lose yours. - Ronald Reagan

I like long walks, especially when they are taken by people who annoy me. - Fred Allen

David Haley
Wizard






Group: Members
Posts: 5,730
Joined: Jun 30, 2007

Go to the bottom of the page Go to the top of the page
#237 Posted Jul 2, 2009, 12:26 am

Not to curb your enthusiasm or anything, but you must have a different definition of "semi-decent debate" than many others here. Maybe the fact that you haven't read all the posts is relevant.  :rolleyes:
.........................
-- d.c.h --
BabbleMUD Project (custom codebase)
Legends of the Darkstone (head coder)
http://david.the-haleys.org
.........................

Runter
Wizard






Group: Members
Posts: 1,074
Joined: Jun 1, 2006

Go to the bottom of the page Go to the top of the page
#238 Posted Jul 2, 2009, 12:28 am


David Haley said:
Not to curb your enthusiasm or anything, but you must have a different definition of "semi-decent debate" than many others here. Maybe the fact that you haven't read all the posts is relevant.  :rolleyes:


Oh, I thought he was being sarcastic. :P
.........................
-Heath

For once you have tasted flight Ruby you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards,
for there you have been and there you will long to return. --
                                              Leonardo Da Vinci Yukihiro Matsumoto

aidil
Magician




Group: Members
Posts: 73
Joined: Feb 9, 2009

Go to the bottom of the page Go to the top of the page
#239 Posted Jul 2, 2009, 2:14 am

Scandum said:
Runter said:
In that case I guess we need to keep David from passing on those bad genes.  Only the Scandums of the world shall reproduce.

Oh wait, you're that guy who like a broken record keeps repeating the same misinterpretation over and over. I'd psychoanalyze you, but I'm stumped about the kind of upbringing that would encourage something as stupid as that.


People wouldn't be talking to you if they didn't want to hear that broken record. Somehow, it entertains them.


Scandum said:
Sandi said:

"Any program where someone other then the person in question gets to decide on someone else's right to procreate will result in prejudice."

I think you're going out on a limb, here. Want a banana?  :smirk:

I wonder if he has a problem with the justice system as well, you know, where someone other than the person in question gets to decide on someone else's right to freedom, certainly that must result in discrimination, prejudice, and.. favoritism. I mean, it's a slippery slope (pause for dramatic effect), before you know it everyone will be in jail.


I happen to be one of those who thinks that criminals have rights, yes. Whatever warped idea you have about that is irrelevant.

shasarak
Sorcerer






Group: Members
Posts: 273
Joined: Nov 28, 2007

Go to the bottom of the page Go to the top of the page
#240 Posted Jul 2, 2009, 4:59 am

David Haley said:
Quote:
So yes, there is a kind of discrimination in that certain people may not be able to have children without going through an embryo screening process, but that, IMO, is a price worth paying for the enormous benefit to happiness and productivity that it generates.

But if we have people genetically engineered to be happy with menial jobs, and all jobs for that matter, that would make them happy (by definition) and therefore productive (as happier people tend to be more productive) -- so maybe it's not so cold after all... after all, it's all in the name of the greater happiness, which seems to be your rationale here!

Your deductive logic may be sound but (IMO) the premise is wrong: I don't agree that deliberately inflicting disabilities on a person until the job that you have decided he should do becomes the most difficult and challenging thing he can cope with will actually make him happy. There's a lot more to life than work, and there are a lot more opportunities for happiness beyond mere job satisfaction. Those other opportunities will be taken away if you mentally cripple someone.

Since (unlike aidil) you obviously don't agree with deliberately causing mental retardation anyway, why are you advocating it?

Topic Locked
Pages:<< prev ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 ... next >>

Valid XHTML 1.1! Valid CSS!