06 Dec, 2011, David Haley wrote in the 21st comment:
Votes: 0
BTW, language please.

donky said:
But if the source data is detail from the real world, then in theory it only needs to be done once.

Only if everybody agrees on what data points they need out of the data.
06 Dec, 2011, kiasyn wrote in the 22nd comment:
Votes: 0
Rarva.Riendf said:
Glass is a fluid


wrong


David Haley said:
BTW, language please.


swearing in this context is perfectly acceptable
06 Dec, 2011, Rarva.Riendf wrote in the 23rd comment:
Votes: 0
kiasyn said:
Rarva.Riendf said:
Glass is a fluid


wrong

Your own link says it is just a point of view matter. And definitely prove you cannot have a single 'material' database because of that.
06 Dec, 2011, David Haley wrote in the 24th comment:
Votes: 0
Kiasyn, something not being against the rules doesn't mean it's polite. We can be civil even if we're being more civil than strictly necessary according to the MB forum rules…
06 Dec, 2011, Newt wrote in the 25th comment:
Votes: 0
We're at code milky green. :cyclops:
06 Dec, 2011, kiasyn wrote in the 26th comment:
Votes: 0
just clarifying for all our silent lurkers
20.0/26