I'm wondering how people self assess their progression.

https://sites.google.com/site/psychotrop...

I would say my progression was:

griefer -> scientist -> planner -> hacker

I'm also interested to see if there are correlations with people's enneagram scores.

https://www.enneagraminstitute.com/dis_s...

My scores: 4 0 4 5 8 6 3 1 5 (Dominantly type 5)

Next there is the 3-D Bartle test, which is a bit of a joke:

http://slackhalla.org/~demise/test/bartl...

Scores:

Griever 87.5
Opportunist 59.375
Networker 62.5
Scientist 78.125
Politician 21.875
Planner 25
Friend 12.5
Hacker 62.5

ANG 0.5
ANX 99.5
SHA 0.5

One obvious flaw in Bartle's progression chart is that I'm neither a planner nor a politician.

Well, I wouldn't dismiss the test. I scored lowest on "Griever", which was the only term I had to look up.

It doesn't look like you can score 0 on any of those profiles. So the fact that you have low scores on Planner and Politician probably means that you wouldn't consider yourself to be either.

The only thing I don't get about this test is why it has '3D' in its name.

Test Scores

Griever 68.75
Opportunist 43.75
Networker 34.375
Scientist 87.5
Politician 62.5
Planner 56.25
Friend 65.625
Hacker 28.125

ANG 83
ANX 66.5
SHA 33.5

If you use Bartle's progression theory someone who evolved from a planner into a hacker might score relatively low as a planner. Though then the questions would have to be formulated in the past tense.

Bartle's original test was 2 dimension, then he added a 3rd dimension.